- Volume 1 (2017)
- Vol. 1 (2017)
- >
- Issue 1
- No. 1
- >
- Pages 397 - 399
- pp. 397 - 399
In a wider sense, a paradox is a counterintuitive discovery that throws light on fundamental questions. This reading is in accordance with the word’s etymology (
1 Beall, J. C. (ed.), 2003, Liars and Heaps, Oxford: Clarendon.
2 Beall, J. C. (ed.), 2007, The Revenge of the Liar, Oxford: OUP.
3 Beall, J. C.; Armour-Garb, B. (eds.), (2005), Deflationism and Paradox, Oxford: Clarendon.
4 Bromand, J., (2001), Philosophie der semantischen Paradoxien, Paderborn: Mentis.
5 Clark, M., (2002), Paradoxes from A to Z, London & New York: Routledge.
6 Field, H., (2008), Saving Truth from Paradox, Oxford: OUP.
7 Grim, P., (1991), The Incomplete Universe, Cambridge (MA) & London: MIT Press.
8 Grünbaum, A., (1968), Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes, London: George Allen and Unwin.
9 Priest, G., (2006), In Contradiction, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon.
10 Ridder, L., (2002), Mereologie, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
11 Sainsbury, R. M., (1995), Paradoxes, 2nd ed., Cambridge: CUP.
12 Sorensen, R., (2003), A Brief History of the Paradox, Oxford: OUP.
13 Williamson, T., (1994), Vagueness, London & New York: Routledge.
14 Yablo, S., (1993), “Paradox without Self-reference”, Analysis 53: 251-252.
