Weiter zum Inhalt


Christopher Cosans

Seiten 41 - 45

In our time animals are considered one of the five kingdoms of life (the others being that of plants, fungi, protests, and monera). Traditionally, animal referred to a living thing that was able to move around, in contrast to plants. As a category, the concept of animal can be traced back to the beginnings of Western thought.

1Department of Philosophy, University of Marylands

1 Amundson, R., (2005), The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2 Aristotle, (1983), Parts of Animals, translated and edited by A. L. Peck, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

3 Brogaard, B., (2004), “Species as Individuals”, Biology and Philosophy 19: 223-224.

4 Buss, L., (1987), The Evolution of Individuality, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

5 Clarke, E., (2010), “The Problem of Biological Individuality”, Biological Theory 5: 312-325.

6 Clarke, E., (2012), “Plant Individuality: A Solution to the Demographer's Dilemma”, Biology and Philosophy 27: 321-361.

7 Cornell, J., (1986), “Newton of the Grassblade? Darwin and the Problem of Organic Teleology”, ISIS 77: 405-421.

8 Cosans, C., (1998), “Aristotle’s Anatomical Philosophy of Nature”, Biology and Philosophy 13: 311-339.

9 Darwin, C., (1859), On the Origin of Species, a facsimile of the first edition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.

10 Dupré, J., (2012), Processes of Life, Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, New York: Oxford University Press.

11 Ereshefsky, M. and Makmiller P., (2013), “Biological Individuality: The Case of Biofilms”, Biology & Philosophy 28: 331-349.

12 Galen, (1968), Galen on the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body: Peri chreias morion De usu partium, translated by M. T. May, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

13 Hall, T., (1972), Rene Descartes: Treatise of Man, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

14 Hankinson, R., (1989), “Galen and the Best of All Possible Worlds”, Classical Quarterly 39: 206-227.

15 Harvey, W., (1995), The Anatomical Exercises: De Motu Cordis and De Circulatione Sanguinis, translated by G. Keynes, Mineola, New York: Dover Publications

16 Kant, I., (1790), Critique of Judgment, translated by W. S. Pluhar, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.

17 Kauffman, S., (1993), The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, New York: Oxford University Press.

18 Pepper, J. W. and Matthew D. Herron, (2008), “Does Biology Need an Organism Concept”, Biological Reviews 83: 621-627.

19 Pradeu, T., (2012), Limits of the Self, New York: Oxford University Press.

20 Raff, R., and Kaufman, T., (1983), Embryos, Genes, and Evolution: The Developmental – Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

21 Richards, R., (1992), The Meaning of Evolution: The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22 Turner, S. J., (2000), The Extended Organism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

23 van, Inwagen, P., (1990), Material Beings, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

24 Webster, G., and Goodwin, B., (1982), “The Origin of Species: A Structuralist Approach”, Journal of Social and Biological Structure 5: 15-47.

25 Wilson, J., (1999), Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities, New York: Cambridge University Press.

26 Wilson, R. A. and Barker, M.“The Biological Notion of Individual”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2013 Edition, Zalta, E. N. (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/biology-individual/.

27 Wilson, R. A., (2005), Genes and the Agents of Life: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences: Biology, New York: Cambridge University Press.

28 Zimmerman, D., (2002), “Persons and Bodies: Constitution Without Mereology?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64: 599-606.


Export Citation