1 Baker, L. R., (1997), “Why Constitution is not Identity”, Journal of Philosophy 94: 599-621.

2 Baker, L. R., (2000), Persons and Bodies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3 Burke, M. B., (1994), “Preserving the Principle of One Object to a Place: A Novel Account of the Relations Among Objects, Sorts, Sortals, and Persistence Conditions”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (3): 591-624. Reprinted in Rea.

4 Burke, M., (1994), “Dion and Theon: An Essentialist Solution to an Ancient Puzzle”, Journal of Philosophy 91: 129-139.

5 Gibbard, A., (1975), “Contingent Identity”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 4: 187-221. Reprinted in Rea 1997.

6 Johnston, M.“Constitution is Not Identity”, Mind 101 (1992): 89-105. Reprinted in Rea 1997.

7 Paul, L. A., (2002), “Logical Parts”, Noûs 36: 578-596.

8 Rea, M. C., (1995), “The Problem of Material Constitution”, Philosophical Review 104: 525-552.

9 Rea, M. C., (1997), Material Constitution: A Reader. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

10 Rea, M. C., (1998), “Sameness Without Identity: An Aristotelian Solution to the Problem of Material Constitution”, Ratio 11: 316-28.

11 Rea, M. C., (2000), “Constitution and Kind Membership”, Philosophical Studies 97: 169-193.

12 Rea, M. C., (2010), “Universalism and Extensionalism”, Analysis 70: 490-96

13 Simons, P., (1987), Parts: A Study in Ontology New York: Oxford University Press.

14 Thomson, J. J., (1983), “Parthood and Identity Across Time”, Journal of Philosophy 80: 201–220. Reprinted in Rea 1997.

15 Thomson, J. J., (1998), “The Statue and the Clay”, Noûs 32: 149-173.

16 Unger, P., (1979), “I Do Not Exist” in MacDonald, G. F. (ed.), Perception and Identity, London: MacMillan Press. Reprinted in Rea 1997.

17 van, Inwagen, P., (1990), Material Beings, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

18 Varzi, A., (2009), “Universalism Entails Extensionalism”, Analysis 69: 599-604.

19 Wasserman, R., (2004), “The Constitution Question”, Noûs 38 (4): 693-710.

20 Zimmerman, D. W., (1995), “Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution”, Philosophical Review 104: 53-110.

21 Zimmerman, D. W., (1997), “Coincident Objects: Could a ‘Stuff Ontology’ Help?”, Analysis 57:19-27.