Skip to content


Christopher Cosans

Pages 41 - 45

In our time animals are considered one of the five kingdoms of life (the others being that of plants, fungi, protests, and monera). Traditionally, animal referred to a living thing that was able to move around, in contrast to plants. As a category, the concept of animal can be traced back to the beginnings of Western thought.

1Department of Philosophy, University of Marylands

1 Amundson, R., (2005), The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2 Aristotle, (1983), Parts of Animals, translated and edited by A. L. Peck, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

3 Brogaard, B., (2004), “Species as Individuals”, Biology and Philosophy 19: 223-224.

4 Buss, L., (1987), The Evolution of Individuality, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

5 Clarke, E., (2010), “The Problem of Biological Individuality”, Biological Theory 5: 312-325.

6 Clarke, E., (2012), “Plant Individuality: A Solution to the Demographer's Dilemma”, Biology and Philosophy 27: 321-361.

7 Cornell, J., (1986), “Newton of the Grassblade? Darwin and the Problem of Organic Teleology”, ISIS 77: 405-421.

8 Cosans, C., (1998), “Aristotle’s Anatomical Philosophy of Nature”, Biology and Philosophy 13: 311-339.

9 Darwin, C., (1859), On the Origin of Species, a facsimile of the first edition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.

10 Dupré, J., (2012), Processes of Life, Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, New York: Oxford University Press.

11 Ereshefsky, M. and Makmiller P., (2013), “Biological Individuality: The Case of Biofilms”, Biology & Philosophy 28: 331-349.

12 Galen, (1968), Galen on the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body: Peri chreias morion De usu partium, translated by M. T. May, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

13 Hall, T., (1972), Rene Descartes: Treatise of Man, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

14 Hankinson, R., (1989), “Galen and the Best of All Possible Worlds”, Classical Quarterly 39: 206-227.

15 Harvey, W., (1995), The Anatomical Exercises: De Motu Cordis and De Circulatione Sanguinis, translated by G. Keynes, Mineola, New York: Dover Publications

16 Kant, I., (1790), Critique of Judgment, translated by W. S. Pluhar, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.

17 Kauffman, S., (1993), The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, New York: Oxford University Press.

18 Pepper, J. W. and Matthew D. Herron, (2008), “Does Biology Need an Organism Concept”, Biological Reviews 83: 621-627.

19 Pradeu, T., (2012), Limits of the Self, New York: Oxford University Press.

20 Raff, R., and Kaufman, T., (1983), Embryos, Genes, and Evolution: The Developmental – Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

21 Richards, R., (1992), The Meaning of Evolution: The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22 Turner, S. J., (2000), The Extended Organism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

23 van, Inwagen, P., (1990), Material Beings, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

24 Webster, G., and Goodwin, B., (1982), “The Origin of Species: A Structuralist Approach”, Journal of Social and Biological Structure 5: 15-47.

25 Wilson, J., (1999), Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities, New York: Cambridge University Press.

26 Wilson, R. A. and Barker, M.“The Biological Notion of Individual”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2013 Edition, Zalta, E. N. (ed.),

27 Wilson, R. A., (2005), Genes and the Agents of Life: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences: Biology, New York: Cambridge University Press.

28 Zimmerman, D., (2002), “Persons and Bodies: Constitution Without Mereology?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64: 599-606.


Export Citation