Skip to content

Continuants and Occurrents


Erwin Tegtmeier


Pages 168 - 171



The term ‘continuant’ has been introduced by W. E. Johnson to replace Aristotle's term of “substance” (ousia) as a residual term, freed from certain controversial philosophical implications. Johnson characterises the continuant as “that which continues to exist while its states and relations may be changing” (Logic I, p. 199). Thus a continuant has a relatively long duration, is a subject, i.e., a bearer of properties and stands in relations to other items. The category of continuants is contrasted with the category of occurrents, which resemble Aristotelian accidents in that they inhere in continuants. Unlike recent uses of the term ‘occurrent’, where ‘occurrent’ is predominantly used to cover the subcategories of processes and events, respectively, in Johnson occurrents are momentary and simple.




1Department of Philosophy, University of Mannheim



1 Aristotle:Metaphysica Z

2 Berkeley, G. Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous I

3 Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature. Book I Part I

4 Bergmann, G., (1964), Realism, University of Wisconsin Press, Section Six

5 Brentano, F., (1976), Philosophische Untersuchungen zu Raum, Zeit und Kontinuum. Meiner

6 Johnson, W.E., (1924), Logic III. Constable. Chapter 7

7 Lewis, D., (1986), On the Plurality of Worlds, Blackwell.

8 Lewis, D, (1976), “Survival and Identity”, in Rorty A. O. (ed.), The Identities of Persons, University of California Press.

9 Seibt, J., (2008), “Beyond Endurance and Perdurance: Recurrent Dynamics.” In Kanzian, C. (ed.), Persistence, Ontos Verlag, 121-153

10 Stout, R., (2016), “The Category of Occurrent Continuants”, Mind 125: 41-62.

11 Tegtmeier, E., (2008), “Persistence” in Kanzian, C. (ed.), Persistence. Ontos Verlag. 185-195

12 Wiggins, D., (2008), Sameness and Substance Renewed. 2 ed. Blackwell

Share


Export Citation